HB 2976 Arizona House · 57th Legislature - Second Regular Session

justice courts; administration; due process

HB 2976 strengthens due process protections for Arizona justices of the peace when state or county entities take administrative actions that affect their statutory duties, such as changing authority or imposing new operational costs. The bill requires these entities to provide written notice, a hearing before an independent officer, clear evidence, and the right to counsel before making such decisions. It also mandates that administrative orders affecting justice courts be reported to the legislature within 10 days with fiscal impact statements, and prevents counties from implementing new requirements without state funding. This directly impacts elected justices of the peace, county governments, and state/county administrative bodies overseeing justice courts.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 4, 2026 Last action Mar 25, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced Version House Engrossed Version (03/11/2026) · 4 edits · Mar 11, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reformatted from a standard legislative draft to an official 'Engrossed' version, which includes the final, polished text ready for signing. The core policy content regarding due process protections for elected justices of the peace remains substantively identical, though the final version adds a new section on county funding obligations to prevent unfunded mandates and clarifies reporting requirements for administrative orders.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's applicability was expanded in the final version by adding Section 22-129, which explicitly protects counties from being forced to implement new operational requirements without state funding or a fiscal impact statement.
FISCAL

Added Section 22-129 to prohibit counties from implementing new operational, staffing, or technology requirements unless the Supreme Court issues a fiscal impact statement and the Legislature appropriates sufficient funds.

REQUIREMENT

Added a specific requirement in Section 22-128 that reports on administrative orders must include a fiscal impact statement identifying any costs imposed on counties.

TECHNICAL

Changed the document title and header from a draft 'Introduced Version' to the official 'House Engrossed Version,' indicating the bill has passed its initial review stages and is in its final form.

Standardized the formatting of the text, converting line-by-line legislative markup into clean, continuous paragraphs and correcting minor capitalization inconsistencies.

Floor votes · House Mar 11, 2026

How they voted

465
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 60
Mar 11, 2026
D Democratic27
16 Yea 5 Nay 6
59% Yea
R Republican33
30 Yea 3
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
1
Mar 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
Feb 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors

Sponsors