fines; fees; assessments; restitution; nonpayment
HB 2825 amends Arizona law to change how courts handle cases where defendants fail to pay court-ordered fines, fees, restitution, or incarceration costs. It requires courts to hold hearings to determine if nonpayment is willful (intentional refusal to pay) before imposing penalties like jail time, explicitly prohibiting incarceration solely due to inability to pay. The bill mandates clear written notices in plain language for defendants about their hearing rights and financial hardship evidence, and allows courts to enter a civil default judgment if defendants skip hearings without valid reason. This directly affects individuals owing court-ordered payments, prosecutors, victims seeking restitution, and courts managing these cases.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 27, 2026
Last action Mar 25, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (02/19/2026)
·
4 edits
·
Feb 19, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reformatted from a standard legislative draft to an official House Engrossed version, adding a new subsection (H) that requires courts to provide payment history to prosecutors and victims, and expanding the list of civil enforcement remedies to include liability setoffs and lottery winnings interception.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on Arizona Revised Statutes Section 13-810 regarding the consequences of nonpayment of fines and restitution, but the official version adds specific procedural requirements for information sharing and expands the definition of civil enforcement remedies.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new requirement for the court clerk to provide the defendant's payment history to prosecutors, victims, and probation departments upon request.
DEFINITION
Added a new definition for 'Civil Enforcement Remedy' that explicitly includes liability setoff programs and the interception of lottery winnings.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new provision allowing the state to pursue civil collection remedies without further court order if a defendant fails to appear at a hearing regarding nonpayment.
TECHNICAL
Converted the text from a draft format with line numbers and markup symbols to a clean, official legislative text format.
Floor votes · House Feb 19, 2026
How they voted
56–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 60
Feb 19, 2026
D
Democratic27
96% Yea
R
Republican33
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
0
Amendments
3
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
DPA
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Feb 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Lopez
RRepublican
Co
Analise Ortiz
DDemocratic
Co
Sarah Liguori
DDemocratic
Co
Walt Blackman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2825
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2825. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline