utility relocation; funding; bonds
HB 2610 requires Arizona municipalities to reimburse telecommunications utilities (like internet, cable, and phone companies) for relocating their facilities when construction projects funded by voter-approved municipal bonds require it. Municipalities must pay these costs within 90 days of receiving verified claims, but total reimbursements for facilities without existing land rights are capped at 2% of the project's bond funds. The bill excludes cases where utilities already have land rights or permits, and it does not apply to bond projects approved before January 1, 2017. This directly affects telecom companies needing relocation and municipalities managing bond-funded projects.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 27, 2026
Last action Mar 10, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (02/26/2026)
·
3 edits
·
Feb 26, 2026
MINOR
The bill was reformatted from an introduced draft to the official House Engrossed version, which includes minor text cleanup and the addition of two new procedural requirements for municipalities. The core policy regarding utility reimbursement remains unchanged, but the updated version now mandates that cities provide public notice of bond projects before requesting utility relocation and establish a formal application process for reimbursement claims.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's applicability remains the same; it still applies to construction projects funded by voter-approved municipal bonds in Arizona municipalities.
REQUIREMENT
Municipalities must provide public notice to telecommunications utilities at least 30 days before requesting facility relocation for bond-funded projects.
Municipalities must develop a formal reimbursement process for utilities to apply for payment of relocation costs.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was cleaned up to remove inconsistent formatting, spacing, and page markers found in the original introduced version.
Floor votes · House Feb 26, 2026
How they voted
50–3
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 60
Feb 26, 2026
D
Democratic27
81% Yea
R
Republican33
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
0
Amendments
2
Feb 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Walt Blackman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2610
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2610. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline