Interstate 11; environmental; engineering; study
HB 2601 directs Arizona's transportation department to request federal approval to divide the Interstate 11 project into segments between the Arizona-Nevada border and Casa Grande. If approved, the department must then conduct a required environmental and engineering study for the non-litigated segment. The bill aims to advance construction planning for most of the corridor while bypassing a federal lawsuit challenging the southern portion, which the legislature states has delayed progress statewide. This action affects the state's transportation planning process and the specific I-11 corridor segment not involved in the ongoing litigation.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2026
Last action Jun 10, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (03/10/2026)
·
4 edits
·
Mar 10, 2026
MODERATE
The bill was reclassified from an 'Introduced Version' to a 'House Engrossed Version,' indicating it has passed initial committee review. Substantively, the bill removes references to a pending lawsuit and changes the project scope to focus on a specific segment between Casa Grande and Wickenburg. It mandates that the state conduct environmental reviews and obtain federal authorizations for this segment regardless of the ongoing legal challenges in southern Arizona.
Scope change
The bill's scope is narrowed from a statewide corridor study to a specific segment between Interstate 10 at Casa Grande and Wickenburg, explicitly separating this section from the contested southern portions of the project.
REQUIREMENT
Replaced a request for project segmentation with a mandate to conduct environmental reviews and obtain federal/state authorizations for the specific segment.
TIMELINE
Removed the specific 14-day deadline for requesting segmentation and the 3-month deadline for starting the study, replacing them with a general requirement to act consistent with federal guidance.
ELIGIBILITY
Deleted all legislative findings that referenced a specific 2022 lawsuit and the argument that the lawsuit was stalling progress.
SCOPE
Changed the project description to define the segment as part of 'INDEPENDENT utility' rather than just a general corridor study.
Floor votes · House Mar 10, 2026
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
8
Committee
2
Amendments
1
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
PASSED
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
Feb 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Matt Gress
RRepublican
Co
Chris Lopez
RRepublican
Co
Leo Biasiucci
RRepublican
Co
Pamela Carter
RRepublican
Co
Teresa Martinez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2601
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2601. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline