arbitration; divorce proceedings; artificial intelligence
HB 2371 allows divorce parties in Arizona to use AI-assisted arbitration only if both consent in writing about whether the outcome is binding or a recommendation, and they have no minor children together. It requires written consent that can be withdrawn anytime before a decision, and establishes a 20-day appeal window to superior court for binding AI decisions, where courts review the case de novo (from scratch) without considering the AI process. The bill defines "AI-assisted arbitration" as a system applying law to disclosed facts to generate divorce-related recommendations or binding decisions, clarifying it is not a legal entity. This bill directly affects divorce litigants seeking alternative dispute resolution, with no minor children involved, and would change how AI tools can be integrated into family court proceedings.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 15, 2026
Last action Mar 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (03/10/2026)
·
3 edits
·
Mar 10, 2026
MINOR
The bill was reorganized into a standard legislative format with updated headers and page numbering. The core policy text regarding AI arbitration in divorce cases was retained but modified to clarify that parties must consent to whether the outcome is a recommendation or a binding decision, and the formatting was cleaned up to remove placeholder lines and inconsistent spacing.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's subject matter remains unchanged, focusing on AI-assisted arbitration in divorce proceedings, but the presentation was formalized for the House Engrossed version.
TECHNICAL
Removed placeholder text, inconsistent spacing, and page markers to conform to official legislative formatting standards.
REQUIREMENT
Clarified the consent requirement by explicitly stating that parties must agree to whether the AI process results in a non-binding recommendation or a binding determination.
DEFINITION
Standardized the definition of 'artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration' and the section title for consistency with statutory drafting conventions.
Floor votes · House Mar 10, 2026
How they voted
42–13
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 60
Mar 10, 2026
D
Democratic27
44% Nay
R
Republican33
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
1
Amendments
1
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
DPA
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Teresa Martinez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2371
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2371. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline