domestic relations; temporary orders; hearings
HB 2254 modifies Arizona's domestic relations laws to improve temporary custody and parenting time orders. It requires courts to reevaluate such orders every six months and mandates a 60-day timeline for hearings on temporary orders, unless parties waive this or extraordinary circumstances exist. The bill also sets a minimum 120-minute hearing time for temporary order cases and requires courts to make specific written findings about factors affecting a child's best interests. This directly affects parents and children involved in custody disputes during divorce or separation proceedings.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action Mar 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version
·
4 edits
·
Mar 4, 2025
MODERATE
This bill amends Arizona statutes governing temporary orders in family law cases involving legal decision-making and parenting time. The changes clarify procedures for temporary orders, set specific timelines for court hearings, and require courts to make detailed factual findings when issuing temporary custody arrangements. These modifications aim to ensure timely resolution of family disputes and protect children's best interests during the pendency of cases.
Scope change
The bill applies to all legal decision-making and parenting time proceedings in Arizona, including those arising from dissolution of marriage, legal separation, or standalone custody cases.
TIMELINE
Added a requirement for courts to reevaluate temporary orders within six months of issuance, with an evidentiary hearing available upon request by either party.
REQUIREMENT
Established a minimum 120-minute hearing time requirement for evidentiary hearings on temporary order petitions involving legal decision-making and parenting time.
Required courts to make specific factual findings on the record when issuing temporary orders, addressing factors under section 25-403 and indicating which factors were considered relevant to the child's best interests.
Clarified that when extraordinary circumstances prevent scheduling a hearing within 60 days, the court must make a written finding on the record explaining the cause of the delay.
Floor votes · House Mar 4, 2025
How they voted
36–22
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 60
Mar 4, 2025
D
Democratic27
81% Nay
R
Republican33
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
1
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
Feb 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
DP
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rachel Keshel
RRepublican
Co
John Gillette
RRepublican
Co
Lisa Fink
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2254
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2254. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline