appropriations; Interstate 10; vehicle lanes
HB 2192 redirects $55.9 million from Arizona's state highway fund to the state general fund (Section E) and appropriates $70 million for fiscal year 2025-2026 and $78 million for 2026-2027 to the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) for constructing additional vehicle lanes on Interstate 10 between State Route 85 and Citrus Road. The bill requires these lanes to be separated by a lighted median and mandates ADOT use design-build or construction-manager-at-risk contracting to expedite the project. This funding directly affects ADOT's highway construction budget and will impact drivers using this I-10 corridor. The legislation changes how transportation funds are allocated and specifies construction methods for the project.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2025
Last action Mar 11, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version
·
4 edits
·
Feb 18, 2025
MODERATE
This bill was amended to update the fiscal years referenced in the appropriations and to change the funding amounts allocated for Interstate 10 vehicle lane construction. The changes also modify the procurement method required for the project from construction-manager-at-risk or design-build to a cost-plus-time (A+B) bidding method.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on funding Interstate 10 vehicle lane construction, but the fiscal years covered were updated from 2025-2026/2026-2027 to 2026-2027/2027-2028, and funding amounts were adjusted.
FISCAL
Fiscal year references were updated from 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 to 2026-2027 and 2027-2028 in the appropriations sections.
The appropriation amount for fiscal year 2026-2027 was changed from $70,000,000 to $40,000,000.
The appropriation amount for fiscal year 2027-2028 was changed from $50,000,000 to $93,000,000.
REQUIREMENT
The required procurement method was changed from construction-manager-at-risk or design-build to cost-plus-time (A+B) bidding.
Floor votes · House Feb 18, 2025
How they voted
60–0
Passed
Total votes 60
Feb 18, 2025
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican33
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
2
Mar 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
DP
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 17, 2025
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Jan 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Livingston
RRepublican
Co
Leo Biasiucci
RRepublican
Co
Michael Carbone
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2192
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2192. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline