An Act relating to the Legislative Ethics Act; relating to legislative subpoenas; relating to the jurisdiction of the office of the ombudsman; and providing for an effective date.
HB 298 amends Alaska's Legislative Ethics Act to clarify which legislative committees are exempt from ethics rules and refine definitions of "agency" under ethics laws. It explicitly excludes legislators, judges, and certain officials from the definition of "agency," affecting how oversight bodies like the ombudsman apply ethics standards. The bill also updates restrictions on legislators accepting benefits, adding specific exceptions for campaign contributions, charity events, and reasonable wedding-related travel. These changes aim to clarify existing ethics rules without creating new prohibitions. The bill is currently in committee referral stage with no recent hearings.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jul 2026
Introduced Feb 9, 2026
Signed Jul 3, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Enrolled HB 298
→
HB 298
·
6 edits
MODERATE
The bill transitions from a web-based legislative summary to the full statutory text of HB 298, which amends the Legislative Ethics Act. The substantive changes expand the definition of 'agency' to include independent state entities, clarify exceptions for legislators regarding private office use and internet access, and establish specific thresholds ($250) and timelines for disclosing gifts. Additionally, the bill strengthens whistleblower protections and formalizes the committee's authority to investigate complaints and impose sanctions.
Scope change
The scope of the 'agency' definition was expanded to include entities independent of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, broadening the reach of the ethics act.
DEFINITION
Expanded the definition of 'agency' to include departments and boards independent of the three branches of state government.
REQUIREMENT
Added specific exceptions allowing legislators to use their private office for non-legislative purposes and use the internet for non-campaign activities.
Established a $250 monetary threshold for disclosing gifts and specified a 60-day window for disclosure.
ENFORCEMENT
Strengthened whistleblower protections by explicitly prohibiting reprisals and allowing employees to bring civil actions for damages.
Formalized the committee's power to subpoena witnesses, take testimony, and issue formal charges with hearings.
TIMELINE
Added new provisions defining 'campaign periods' to limit committee jurisdiction over candidates during election cycles.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
50
Key actions
7
Committee
2
May 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
(S) TRANSMITTED TO (H) AS AMENDED
upper
May 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
(S) PASSED Y20 N-
upper
May 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
(S) JUD SCS ADOPTED UC
upper
May 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
(S) Moved SCS HB 298(JUD) Out of Committee
upper
May 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
(H) TRANSMITTED TO (S)
lower
May 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
(H) PASSED Y37 E3
lower
Mar 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
(H) Moved HB 298 Out of Committee
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 298
Scope: AK
Hi! I can help you understand HB 298. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline