Clarke County, sheriff authorized to collect fees for certain services
HB 456 authorizes the sheriff in Clarke County to collect fees for certain services. This bill specifically adds individuals applying for a pistol permit to the list of those who may be charged these fees. Conversely, it exempts the district attorney and grand jury from paying these fees when requesting services related to law enforcement, investigatory, or prosecutorial functions. The act aims to clarify the sheriff's authority to collect fees and establish specific exemptions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Mar 19, 2025
Signed May 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Engrossed
→
Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
May 6, 2025
MINOR
The bill was finalized from its engrossed version to the enrolled version, which is the final version ready for the Governor's signature. The most significant substantive change involves the distribution of fees collected by the Clarke County Sheriff. The final version requires the county commission to split the fees collected for court-ordered ankle monitors between the Sheriff's Fund and the Circuit Clerk's Fund, whereas the previous version directed all such funds solely to the Sheriff's Fund. Additionally, a specific $50 fee amount was removed from the service of process section, replaced with language allowing a 'reasonable' fee.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding fee distribution was narrowed for the Sheriff's Fund, as half of the ankle monitor fees must now go to the Circuit Clerk's Fund instead of the Sheriff's Fund.
FISCAL
The allocation of fees collected for court-ordered ankle monitors was changed; the county commission must now deposit half in the Sheriff's Fund and half in the Circuit Clerk's Fund, instead of depositing all in the Sheriff's Fund.
REQUIREMENT
The specific $50 fee amount for service of process was removed and replaced with language allowing officials to assess a 'reasonable' service of process fee.
TECHNICAL
Minor technical updates were made to the bill's title page and certification sections to reflect its final enrolled status.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
9
Committee
4
Amendments
3
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Jackson Concur In and Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 1016
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass as Amended - Adopted Roll Call 636
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Chambliss motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 635
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced
Local Legislation 1st Amendment Offered (Local Legislation )
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported Out of Committee Second House
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Introduced
Local Legislation 1st Amendment (Local Legislation )
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
Pending Committee Action in Second House (Local Legislation )
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass as Amended - Adopted Roll Call 547
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 546
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Introduced
Jackson 1st Amendment Offered
lower
Mar 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (Local Legislation)
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Thomas Jackson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 456
Scope: AL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 456. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline